<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ever Heard of Communicate.com (Symbol: CMNN)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogpennystocks.com/2005/02/07/ever-heard-of-communicatecom-symbol-cmnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogpennystocks.com/2005/02/07/ever-heard-of-communicatecom-symbol-cmnn/</link>
	<description>Blogpennystocks offers you information, investment tips, and reviews on top performing penny stocks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:15:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Buttler</title>
		<link>http://blogpennystocks.com/2005/02/07/ever-heard-of-communicatecom-symbol-cmnn/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>John Buttler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 04:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpennystocks.com/?p=172#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Dot.com sites have really been picking up.  I dont think people need to fdear then like the old days.  Bank and VC&#039;s where crazy back then, but now &quot;no one&quot; is going to give real money to a tech company unless it is doing a real service.

I will start following these guys.  I have a small portfolio of near IPO dot.com companies I always follow....  These are aleary open but I still like the sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dot.com sites have really been picking up.  I dont think people need to fdear then like the old days.  Bank and VC&#8217;s where crazy back then, but now &#8220;no one&#8221; is going to give real money to a tech company unless it is doing a real service.</p>
<p>I will start following these guys.  I have a small portfolio of near IPO dot.com companies I always follow&#8230;.  These are aleary open but I still like the sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wealth Junkie</title>
		<link>http://blogpennystocks.com/2005/02/07/ever-heard-of-communicatecom-symbol-cmnn/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Wealth Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 06:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpennystocks.com/?p=172#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Note 2 of their most recent 10Q filing financials says:  &quot;Revenue from the sale and lease of domain names, whose carrying values are recorded as intangible assets, consists primarily of funds earned for the transfer of rights to domain names that are currently in the Company’s control. Collectibility of revenues generated is subject to a high level of uncertainty; accordingly revenues are recognized only as received. Lease payments paid in advance are recorded as deferred revenue.&quot;

I have doubts about their finances.  Their balance sheet has approximately $1.5 million in intangibles that the company is claiming is due to domain name sales?  I&#039;m no expert, but since a domain can be purchased for under $10, this doesn&#039;t make sense to me.

Yes, they posted record growth in revenue, but I haven&#039;t read a thing about their EARNINGS.  And EARNINGS are the most important thing when it comes to the long-term valuation of a stock, so much that Peter Lynch, legendary investor and former Fidelity Magellan fund manager, devoted a whole chapter to it in his book, &quot;One Up On Wall Street&quot;. (We discuss this in detail &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.wealthjunkie.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on our site.&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note 2 of their most recent 10Q filing financials says:  &#8220;Revenue from the sale and lease of domain names, whose carrying values are recorded as intangible assets, consists primarily of funds earned for the transfer of rights to domain names that are currently in the Company’s control. Collectibility of revenues generated is subject to a high level of uncertainty; accordingly revenues are recognized only as received. Lease payments paid in advance are recorded as deferred revenue.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have doubts about their finances.  Their balance sheet has approximately $1.5 million in intangibles that the company is claiming is due to domain name sales?  I&#8217;m no expert, but since a domain can be purchased for under $10, this doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
<p>Yes, they posted record growth in revenue, but I haven&#8217;t read a thing about their EARNINGS.  And EARNINGS are the most important thing when it comes to the long-term valuation of a stock, so much that Peter Lynch, legendary investor and former Fidelity Magellan fund manager, devoted a whole chapter to it in his book, &#8220;One Up On Wall Street&#8221;. (We discuss this in detail <a HREF="http://www.wealthjunkie.com" rel="nofollow">on our site.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.206 seconds -->

